Legal Opinion
Terris v. Cnty. of Santa Barbara
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided February 16, 2018No. 2d Civ. No. B268849PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, P. J.
*409*553Campbell v. Regents of University of California (2005) 35 Cal.4th 311, 25 Cal.Rptr.3d 320, 106 P.3d 976 holds that public employees must pursue appropriate internal administrative remedies before filing a civil action against their employer. Labor Code section 244 does not require a litigant to exhaust administrative remedies before bringing a civil action.1 Here we hold section 244 applies only to claims before the Labor Commissioner. It has no effect on the Campbell rule.
Plaintiff Shawn Terris appeals a summary judgment in favor of her former employer, defendant County of Santa Barbara…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Campbell v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Williams v. Chino Valley Independent Fire DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Basurto v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Palmer v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kailikole v. Palomar Cmty. Coll. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- People v. Abdul-RahmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
- (PS) Gifford v. Hornbrook Fire Protection DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021