Legal Opinion

Young v. Baker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1902No. 3,605PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Knox Circuit Court; 6r. W. Shaw, Judge. Action by William Baker against Marshall Young and others on a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

The appellee’s complaint was in three paragraphs, each of which was founded upon a promissory noto, identical, except as to the time of payment; the first of the series being of the tenor following: “$533.33. Crawfordsville, Ind., March 25, 1896. October 1, 1897, after date, we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of Thompson S. Bland, payable at the First National Bank of Vincennes, Ind., $533.33, value received, without any. relief from valuation or appraisement laws, with interest at six per cent, per annum from date, payable annually until paid, and attorney’s fees. The drawers…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Angle v. North-Western Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Wood v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Holmes v. TrumperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Giberson v. JolleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. LudlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Citizens Savings Bank of Columbus v. HalsteadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. GarrardIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. McCormick v. HigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API