General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Garrard
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Lee, C. J.
— Eespondents, Garrard and Bennett, executed a conditional sale contract for the purchase of an automobile, which had attached thereto, and as a part of such sale contract, the note sued on in this action. 'Thereafter, this note was detached from the part containing sale agreement and was indorsed to appellant, who brings this action to recover thereon, claiming that the instrument is a negotiable promissory note and that it is a holder in due course.
Respondents contend that the two parts of this agreement should be considered together, and when so considered, it is non-negotiable and subject…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erickson v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Kimpton v. Studebaker Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Trigg v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- Stevens v. VenemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. TalbottIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- C. I. T. Corp. v. PetittoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
- Security Finance Co. v. Jensen Auto Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929