Legal Opinion
In Re Willingham
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 3, 1998No. 96-BG-1504PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
717 A.2d 342 (1998)
In re N. Jerome WILLINGHAM, Respondent.
No. 96-BG-1504.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued May 21, 1998.
Decided September 3, 1998.
N. Jerome Willingham, respondent, pro se.
Donna M. DeSilva, Assistant Bar Counsel, with whom Leonard H. Becker, Bar Counsel, was on the brief, for the Office of Bar Counsel.
Elizabeth J. Branda, Executive Attorney, for the Board on Professional Responsibility.
Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and FARRELL and KING,[*] Associate Judges.
2Per curiam
Respondent, N. Jerome Willingham, a member of the bars of the State of North Carolina and the District of…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re ChisholmDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- In re WillinghamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re GonzalezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re MuhammadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024