Legal Opinion

Plantier v. Ramona Mun. Water Dist.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 13, 2017No. D069798PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenke, Acting P.J.

*859Plaintiffs and appellants Eugene G. Plantier, as Trustee of the Plantier Family Trust (Plantier); Progressive Properties Incorporated (Progressive); and Premium Development LLC (Premium), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (collectively plaintiffs), appeal the judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Ramona Municipal Water District (District or RMWD). In this class action, the trial court found plaintiffs failed to exhaust their administrative remedies under article XIII D of the California Constitution in connection with plaintiffs' substantive challenge to the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Rosenfield v. MalcolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. VerjilCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foster v. SextonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Muskan Food & Fuel, Inc. v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API