Rosenfield v. Malcolm
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
Like Bagley v. Washington Township Hospital Dist., ante, p. 499 [55 Cal.Rptr. 401, 421 P.2d 409], the present ease requires us to consider the constitutionality of restraints imposed upon the political activities of public employees. In the present case, however, unlike Bagley, the employing agency does not even attempt to demonstrate that the restrictions imposed upon plaintiff’s political activities were necessary to maintain its efficiency and integrity but boldly asserts that it may dismiss for any reason whatsoever *561an employee who has not attained protected civil service status. For the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bagley v. Washington Township Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Metcalf v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Martino v. Concord Community Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Bernstein v. SmutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.