Legal Opinion

H. J. Griffith Realty Co. v. Hobbs Houses, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1960No. 6643PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the trial court to set aside a restrictive covenant contained in a deed to property of the plaintiff. Plaintiff also complains of the failure of the trial court to make a declaration as to the meaning and legal effect of the restriction, if found to be valid.

The real controversy in the case has to do with the construction and effect of a provisional condition contained in the deed from the defendant to the plaintiff’s predecessor in title.

The property involved, consisting of 14.21 acres within the city of Hobbs, was purchased from the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parrish v. NewburyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  2. Hayes v. GibbsUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Laughlin v. WagnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Booker v. Old Dominion Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  5. Continental Oil Co. v. FennemoreArizona Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Montoya v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hines Corp. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Cree Meadows, Inc. (NSL) v. PalmerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Heath v. ParkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Suttle v. BaileyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API