Legal Opinion
Mannick v. Wakeland
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 24, 2004No. Nos. 24,078, 24,280PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} This appeal involves two related cases: a foreclosure case, in which Paul and Kathy Mannick (the Mannicks) foreclosed on a judgment lien against Robin Wakeland’s (Wakeland) property, and a waste case, in which the Mannicks and their successor in interest, Coppler & Mannick, P.C., sought to recover damages from Wakeland for actions she took to devalue the property that was the subject of the foreclosure case. The district court denied Wakeland’s motion to enter judgment on an earlier mandate from this Court in the foreclosure case, in which she was awarded a $30,000…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Morgan Keegan Mortgage Co. v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Ontiveros Insulation Co., Inc. v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Golden Cone Concepts, Inc. v. Villa Linda Mall, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coppler & Mannick, P.C. v. WakelandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ContrerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re HamiltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Rendleman v. HeinleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Charter Bank v. FrancoeurNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.