Nelson v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The facts of this case are not in dispute. Appellant Thomas Nelson (“Nelson”) insured two vehicles on a policy provided by respondent California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau (“CSAA”). This policy provided uninsured motorist (“UM”) coverage in the amount of $15,000.00 per person and $30,000.00 per accident, for which Nelson paid a premium of $60.00 per vehicle. Nelson’s CSAA policy contained a provision which excluded UM coverage for any injury sustained while occupying an owned but uninsured vehicle (“owned but uninsured exclusion”). 1 Nelson also owned a…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada BellNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hinkel Ex Rel. HinkelNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Ellison v. California State Automobile Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Allstate Insurance v. MaglishNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Zobrist v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1987
4Cited by8 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. NealNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Clark v. Columbia/HCA Information Services, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Prime Insurance Syndicate, Inc. v. DamasoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2007
- Continental Insurance v. MurphyNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CoatneyNevada Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.