Legal Opinion

Nelson v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1998No. 29232PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The facts of this case are not in dispute. Appellant Thomas Nelson (“Nelson”) insured two vehicles on a policy provided by respondent California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau (“CSAA”). This policy provided uninsured motorist (“UM”) coverage in the amount of $15,000.00 per person and $30,000.00 per accident, for which Nelson paid a premium of $60.00 per vehicle. Nelson’s CSAA policy contained a provision which excluded UM coverage for any injury sustained while occupying an owned but uninsured vehicle (“owned but uninsured exclusion”). 1 Nelson also owned a…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada BellNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hinkel Ex Rel. HinkelNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Ellison v. California State Automobile Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Allstate Insurance v. MaglishNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Zobrist v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1987

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. NealNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Clark v. Columbia/HCA Information Services, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Prime Insurance Syndicate, Inc. v. DamasoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2007
  4. Continental Insurance v. MurphyNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CoatneyNevada Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API