Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Land Situated in City of Detroit

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 20, 1982No. Civ. A. 79-73934PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILMORE, District Judge.

This case, which is a condemnation proceeding involving land adjoining the Ambassador Bridge Border Station in Detroit, is before the Court on a motion in limine by plaintiff United States, which asks this Court to determine defendants’ appraisal to be inadmissible. For reasons given in this opinion, the Court denies the motion.

Any broad pretrial exclusion of evidence (here the defendants’ entire appraisal) in an eminent domain proceeding, or any other proceeding, must be approached with great caution. Although the use of a motion in limine is authorized for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Lawrence R. Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Goldman v. Healthcare Management Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. United States v. Certain Land Situated In The City Of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Certain Land Situated in City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  4. United States v. MackDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  5. United States v. DimoraDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API