Legal Opinion
United States v. Mack
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 5, 2014No. 1:13CR278PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SARA LIOI, District Judge.
Before the Court is the in limine motion of the government to preclude defendant Jeremy Mack from presenting evidence of prior involvement in commercial sex acts that did not involve force, threats of force, fraud, or coercion (Doc. No. 121). Defendant has filed a response (Doc. No. 123). The Court conducted a hearing on this and other pre-trial motions on January 30, 2014, and, after entertaining oral argument, announced its ruling on this motion on the record. This Opinion and Order shall memorialize that ruling.
I. Background
The facts of this…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Estrada-TepalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Allstate Insurance Company v. PapanekDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Jacoby v. Gemini Transport, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Jessica Quinones, Allen Mentz, and Shannon Mesko v. Edgewater Yacht Club, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- United States v. Antonio RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.