Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Land Situated in City of Detroit

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 20, 2002No. 79-CV-73934-DTPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE AND DEFENDANT DETROIT INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE COMPANY’S VALUATION THEORIES

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This condemnation action is presently before the Court for trial on the issue of just compensation due to Defendant Detroit International Bridge Company (“DIBCO”) for two parcels of property taken by the Government in 1979 for the expansion of the U.S. Customs secondary cargo inspection facility on the American side of the Ambassador Bridge. The property taken is comprised of two parcels (A1 and A3) between 20th and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Land Situated In The City Of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. In Re Compuware Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  3. United States v. Certain Land SituatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Certain Land Situated in City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.19 Acres of Land, Owned By Cletus Woodrow Bohon and Beverly Ann BohonDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API