Thomas A. Armbruster, Inc. v. Barron
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
Eugene V. Barron, appellant, and two others, were officers and sole shareholders in the RBR Corporation (hereinafter, RBR). The primary purpose of RBR was to construct a bowling alley. Each of the principals owned a one-third interest in the corporation. On March 6, 1979, Thomas A. Armbruster, Inc., a general contractor, entered into a construction agreement with RBR to build the bowling alley. On March 30th of the same year, Armbruster discovered that RBR did not own the land upon which the bowling alley was being constructed, and also that RBR had not yet obtained financing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ingrassia Const. Co., Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Blumer v. DorfmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Hedden v. LupinskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Eastern Wood Products Co. v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Kampman v. Pittsburgh Contracting & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- O'BRIEN v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Yarnall v. AlmySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Temple University Hospital, Inc. v. Healthcare Management Alternatives, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Biller v. ZieglerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.