Legal Opinion

Blumer v. Dorfman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1972No. Appeal, 615PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pomeroy,

On May 8, 1962 appellant Anna Blumer commenced an action in assumpsit against appellee Martin Dorfman. The complaint alleged facts which may be summarized as follows: In 1958 appellant was the owner of certain premises located at 1900 North 32nd Street in Philadelphia which she leased to a tenant. Appellee Dorfman was a real estate broker in the area. In September, 1958, while the premises were under lease, appellant and appellee entered into an oral agreement whereby the latter promised that in return for appellant’s terminating the tenancy of the then occupant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. GOLDMAN v. McShainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Portnoy v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Brown v. HahnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Royal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Tunnelton Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Bartanus v. LisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Flight Systems, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Duffee v. JudsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Moore v. McComseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Keil v. GoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API