Woodley v. . Combs
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The defendants contend that plaintiff is suing for $1,250 — one-half of the principal of the notes in controversy, which she owned but has elected to ratify the sale, and by so doing she can recover only her part of what the sale brought, and this amount has been placed in the clerk’s office for her. Therefore, the judgment of nonsuit is correct. But the amendment goes further and says: “But in alleging that she waives the said wrong, does not intend to say that the sale is in any respect ratified,” etc. In plaintiff’s prayer she says: “And for such rights at law and equity as the allegations…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNeill v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Alexander v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Hendon v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Mitchell v. . ShufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- North Carolina Mortgage Corp. v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bruton v. BlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Chason v. . MarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Life Insurance Co. v. SmathersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- General Realty Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937