Life Insurance Co. v. Smathers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The defendants contend: “(1) Did the court err in striking as irrelevant and immaterial the allegations in the answers of the defendants, as shown by the court’s order?” "We think not.
1ST. C. Code, 1935 (Michie), section 537, is as follows: “If irrelevant or redundant matter is inserted in a pleading, it may be stricken out on motion of any person aggrieved thereby, hut this motion must he made before answer or demurrer, or before an extension of time to plead is granted. When the allegations of a pleading are so indefinite or uncertain that the precise nature of the charge or defense is not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Poovey v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Revis v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Weiner v. Equel's Style Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Commissioners of Yancey Co. v. PiercySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re the Foreclosure of a Certain Deed of Trust From WattsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Edwards Ex Rel. Edwards v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.