Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. McLeod
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEYER, Justice.
This is an action instituted by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 40A-19, our statutory provision for private condemnation of privately owned real property. Specifically, plaintiff seeks by its action an easement over defendant’s land to enable it to provide telephone service to Mr. Dennis P. Turlington, one of its custom ers. The issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion, and in denying plaintiffs motion, for summary judgment on the grounds that the desired condemnation was not for “the public use or benefit” as required by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Charlotte v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Miller v. Town of PulaskiSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- State Highway Commission v. BattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Dyer v. Texas Electric Service Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Calco EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- TOWN OF MIDLAND v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. BehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Stout v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Tucker v. City of KannapolisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.