Legal Opinion

Tucker v. City of Kannapolis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 2003No. COA02-1038PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant City of Kannapolis sought to condemn the property of plaintiffs Robert and Carolyn Tucker in order to acquire an easement for expansion of the City’s sewer system. The Tuckers filed a declaratory judgment action asking the trial court to declare that the City had no authority to condemn their property. Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s order in favor of the City.

Plaintiffs contend on appeal that the trial court erred in refusing to allow Mr. Tucker to testify orally to rebut the City’s affidavits and that those affidavits are insufficient to support the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Von Viczay v. ThomsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. City of Charlotte v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Von Viczay v. ThomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Medearis v. Trustees of Myers Park Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sugar Creek Charter School, Inc. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Caswell County v. Town of YanceyvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. The Cherry Cmty. Org. v. The City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Bledsoe v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. City of Asheville v. Resurgence Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API