Legal Opinion

Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Behm

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2019No. 20180321PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tufte, Justice.

[¶1] Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. ("MDU") appeals, and Lavern Behm cross-appeals, from a judgment dismissing MDU's eminent domain action. Because the district court misapplied North Dakota law in concluding a taking was not necessary for a public use, we reverse and remand for trial on eminent domain damages to be awarded to Behm.

I

[¶2] MDU brought an eminent domain action under N.D.C.C. ch. 32-15 to acquire an easement across Behm's property for a 3,000-foot natural gas pipeline to service a Burlington Northern Santa Fe ("BNSF") railroad switch. The railroad switch must be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Otter Tail Power Company v. MalmeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Oakes Municipal Airport Authority v. WieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Dyer v. Texas Electric Service Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984
  4. City of Medora v. GolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Spring Valley Water Works v. San Mateo Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MDU v. BehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Petro-Hunt v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. City of Fargo v. WielandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Sargent Cty. Water Resource District v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Alber v. Rodin, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API