Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Behm
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Tufte, Justice.
[¶1] Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. ("MDU") appeals, and Lavern Behm cross-appeals, from a judgment dismissing MDU's eminent domain action. Because the district court misapplied North Dakota law in concluding a taking was not necessary for a public use, we reverse and remand for trial on eminent domain damages to be awarded to Behm.
I
[¶2] MDU brought an eminent domain action under N.D.C.C. ch. 32-15 to acquire an easement across Behm's property for a 3,000-foot natural gas pipeline to service a Burlington Northern Santa Fe ("BNSF") railroad switch. The railroad switch must be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Otter Tail Power Company v. MalmeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Oakes Municipal Airport Authority v. WieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Dyer v. Texas Electric Service Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984
- City of Medora v. GolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Spring Valley Water Works v. San Mateo Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- MDU v. BehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Petro-Hunt v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- City of Fargo v. WielandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Sargent Cty. Water Resource District v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Alber v. Rodin, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.