Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Brandeburg
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 18, 1996No. 1:95-cv-01092PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Eddie and Grace Byrd have moved for summary judgment on their claims against the remaining defendants in this case, Brad Brandeburg and his parents Cheryl and Gerald Brandeburg. (Docket # 15). The defendants’ response was due on February 2, 1996, but no response was ever filed and defendants have not requested an extension of time to respond. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
The Summary Judgment Standard
Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dictates that, where summary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Manzer v. Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Barton Willoughby, D/B/A Willoughby FarmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cox v. City of Dallas TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Sporn v. Ocean Colony Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Baker v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
- Whisby-Myers v. KiekenappDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Egan v. SchmockDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.