Egan v. Schmock
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
[Docket No. 12]
FOGEL, District Judge.
On April 10, 2000, the Court heard oral argument regarding Defendants’ motion to dismiss. The motion will be granted in part and denied in part for the reasons set forth below.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are Kulwant Egan, his wife Tara Egan, and their minor son Sachit Egan (“the Egans”). They allege that their neighbors, Mr. and Mrs. Schmock, have been harassing and intimidating them for more than nine years because of their national origin, which is East Indian. The complaint sets forth a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Donald H. Albrecht, and Joanne Albrecht v. William S. LundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Covey v. Hollydale Mobilehome EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lawrence v. Courtyards at Deerwood Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Cabrera v. AlvarezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Gourlay v. Forest Lake Estates Civic Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- Xiong Xeng Moua v. City of ChicoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Four Navy Seals v. Associated PressDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.