Legal Opinion

Baker v. John Morrell & Co.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided June 11, 2003No. C01-4003-MWBPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER ALLOCATION OF DAMAGES AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO RECONSIDER RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION. .916

II. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER.

A. Factual and Procedural

B. Applicable Standards Governing Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider

1. Rule 59(e).

2. Rule 60(b).

C. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.

1. Did Baker plead her ICRA claims out of court?.

2. Rule 10(b)’s effect on Baker’s Rule 8 argument.

D. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(b).

E. Federal Rule of…

2Cases cited160 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Precourt v. Fairbank Reconstruction Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2011
  2. Velez v. RocheDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
  3. Richardson v. Tricom Pictures & Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
  4. Doctor John's, Inc. v. City of Sioux City, IADistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
  5. TZ EX REL. CG v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API