Anderson Trucking Service, Inc. v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellants allege the district court erred in granting summary judgment in their declaratory judgment action on the grounds that their claim for contribution or reimbursement was not a covered claim as defined by the Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association Act (the Act). Minn.Stat. § 60C.09, subd. 2(2) (1990).
FACTS
In 1977, Franklin Nelson, an employee of appellant Anderson Trucking Service, Inc. (Anderson), was injured on the job and a workers’ compensation claim was paid by Anderson’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier, Carriers Insurance Company. In 1986,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Ferrari v. TotoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Ursin v. Ins. Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Sussman v. OstroffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- California Union Insurance v. Central National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v. H & W Motor Express Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Unique Systems Development, Inc. v. Star AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Van Guilder v. National Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004