Van Guilder v. National Freight, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, David Van Guilder’s conservator asserts that he is entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) because the jury’s award of past medical' expenses is inadequate and the jury’s determination that he was causally negligent is not supported by the record. National Freight challenges the district court’s denial of its motion to reallocate the uncollectible portion of New Prime’s equitable share of the judgment under MinmStat. § 604.02, subd. 2 (2002). As to Van Guilder’s appeal, we reverse the denial of JNOV as to damages and affirm…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Morris v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Sands v. Pa. Ins. Guaranty Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Mathews v. MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carrozza v. GreenbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005