Legal Opinion

Unique Systems Development, Inc. v. Star Agency

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1993No. C8-92-1810PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Respondent Unique Systems Development, Inc. (Unique) obtained a directed verdict and a judgment for damages against respondent Star Agency (Star) and appellants American Executive Agency, Inc. and Peter Bergerson (American). Star paid the judgment amount and, along with Unique, then sought to enforce the judgment against American. Because their insurer had become insolvent, American sought a permanent injunction prohibiting Unique and Star from enforcing the judgment against them directly. The trial court de nied American’s request and this appeal followed.

FACTS

In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Witkowski v. BrownSuperior Court of Delaware · 1989
  4. Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Dunbar Kapple, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Bush Terrace Homeowners Ass'n v. RidgewayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v. H & W Motor Express Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Van Guilder v. National Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API