Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v. H & W Motor Express Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1993No. C8-93-778PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

An insurer that paid uninsured motorist benefits challenges the district court’s ruling that it cannot recover the insured’s retained limit from the insured of an insolvent insurer. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

On December 13, 1984, a truck driven by an employee of respondent H & W Motor Express Company struck a ear owned by appellant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) and driven by a 3M employee. H & W was insured under a policy issued by Carriers Insurance Company, which became insolvent after the accident. Because of the insolvency of Carriers, Northwestern…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. McIntosh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Hormel Foods Corp. v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  3. Johnson v. BraddyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Van Guilder v. National Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API