Legal Opinion
In re Cummings
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 1984No. 83-605PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was temporarily suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia on September 14, 1983. In re Cummings, 466 A.2d 1224 (D.C.1983) (Cummings I). The Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) and Bar Counsel have both filed motions asking us to hold respondent in contempt for failure to comply with the order of suspension, other orders and requests of the Board issued pursuant to our order, and certain provisions of our Rules Governing the Bar. The motions raise several legal and factual issues which must be resolved before we may determine whether respondent is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Scolaro v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re CummingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Scolaro v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997