Legal Opinion

In re Cummings

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1984No. 83-605Published

1Per curiam

Almost a year ago we ordered respondent temporarily suspended from the practice of law, pending the outcome of disciplinary proceedings against him. In re Cummings, 466 A.2d 1224 (D.C.1983) (Cummings I). When respondent failed to comply with certain additional provisions of the suspension order, with orders of the Board of Professional Responsibility (the Board) issued pursuant to our order, and with our Rules Governing the Bar, both the Board and Bar Counsel filed motions asking us to hold respondent in contempt. Because those motions raised certain factual issues which needed to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In Re MalvinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. In Re CummingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. In re CummingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API