Legal Opinion

Scolaro v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1997No. 96-AA-1738Published

1Opinion of the Court

691 A.2d 77 (1997)

Patricia SCOLARO, et al., Petitioners,

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, Respondent,

Rebecca Sinderbrand, et al., Intervenors.

No. 96-AA-1738.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued January 31, 1997.

Decided March 20, 1997.

Don W. Crockett, Washington, DC. for petitioners.

Kenneth McGhie, with whom Alice P. McCrory-Miller, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for respondent.

Daniel H. Bromberg, with whom Timothy B. Dyk, Barbara McDowell, and Brian Goebel, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for intervenors.

Arthur B. Spitzer, Washington, DC, filed a brief and…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Lloyd v. BabbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API