Legal Opinion
Bauer v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1999No. D032327PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Plaintiff Gayle Bauer appeals a judgment denying petition administrative mandate against defendants City of San Diego, San Diego City Council, San Diego Board of Zoning Appeals, and San Diego Developmental Services Department (together, City), Bauer contends the court should have found that the City’s procedure in deeming the 60-day suspension of Bauer’s California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license to terminate automatically Bauer’s “grandfathered” existing legal nonconforming use 1 of her property as a liquor store under Business and Professions Code…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Rosenblit v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Calvert v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- San Remo v. City and County of San FraciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Santa Barbara Patients' Collective Health Cooperative v. City of Santa BarbaraDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.