Legal Opinion

SCHWAN'S IP, LLC v. Kraft Pizza Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 28, 2005No. Civ. 04-125 (MJD/JGL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION .

This is a trademark dispute regarding the use of the term BRICK Oven 1 in describing frozen pizzas. Defendant Kraft Pizza Company (“Kraft”) has filed two motions for summary judgment on the trademark claim of Plaintiffs Schwan’s IP, LLC, and Schwan’s Consumer Brands North America, Inc. (collectively, “Schwan’s”). Kraft’s first motion seeks judgment under Fed. R.Civ.P. 56, arguing that Briok Oven is generic, is descriptive and lacks secondary meaning, or — in the alternative — that Kraft’s use of that term constitutes fair use. Kraft’s second motion…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Aromatique, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gold Seal, Inc., and Darrell Bufford, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. General Mills, Inc. v. Kellogg Company, Kellogg Company v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Co-Rect Products, Inc. v. Marvy! Advertising Photography, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Booking.com B.V. v. MatalDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
  2. Closed Loop Marketing, Inc. v. Closed Loop Marketing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  3. PSK, LLC v. HicklinDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2010
  4. Schoene v. ChristensenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API