Legal Opinion
Aromatique, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gold Seal, Inc., and Darrell Bufford, Appellants/cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 20, 1994No. 93-3260, 93-3482PublishedCited by 165 opinions
1Per curiam
For the reasons given in Parts I and II of the opinion filed by Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the order is vacated. Aroma-tique’s federal trademarks at issue here, Reg. Nos. 1,492,855 and 1,492,856, are can-celled. Gold Seal’s request for attorneys’ fees is denied.
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
This case began as an action filed in 1987 in the Chancery Court of Cleburne County, Arkansas, for infringement of Aromatique’s trade dress. It was removed to federal district court after Aromatique amended its complaint to include a count of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by165 opinions
- Duraco Products, Inc. v. Joy Plastic Enterprises, Ltd., D/B/A Backyard Products Travis Products, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Bose Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Advance Watch Company, Limited v. Kemper National Insurance Company, the Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Au-Tomotive Gold, Inc. v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Stuart Hall Company, Inc., a Missouri Corporation v. Ampad Corp., a Massachusetts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.