Todd v. Federated Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Appellant Ronnie Todd commenced this declaratory judgment action against respondent Federated Mutual Insurance Company (Federated) to determine the amount of uninsured motorist coverage available under two insurance policies, a business automobile insurance policy (hereinafter “primary policy”), and a commercial umbrella liability policy (hereinafter “umbrella policy”). The issues on appeal are whether the trial judge erred in reforming the primary policy to include uninsured motorist coverage up to the amount of liability coverage, and whether the trial judge erred in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Moser v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Hartbarger v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Continental Ins. Co. v. HoweDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- James M. Dickau v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Sidelnik v. American States Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
- Randall L. Schmitt v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Antley v. Nobel InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.