Legal Opinion
King v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 16, 2006No. 2-04-515-CRPublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE WALKER, Justice.
I. Introduction
Appellant Krystal Rena King appeals her conviction for murder. A jury found King guilty and assessed her punishment at fifty years’ confinement, and the trial court sentenced her accordingly. In fifteen points, King complains that the trial court erred by admitting extraneous offense evidence, by admitting a eo-conspirator’s statements, by denying King’s requested accomplice witness charges, and by failing to include a proper application paragraph in its charge on duress. We will affirm.
II. Factual and Procedural Background
On June 9, 2003, Lake Dallas…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- Orona v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2011
- Bennie Fuelberg v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014
- Guevara v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.