Orona v. State

*455OPINION

SUE WALKER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A jury found Appellant Alejandro Orona guilty of murder and assessed his punishment at life imprisonment. The trial court sentenced him accordingly. In eight points, Orona argues that insufficient evidence exists to sustain his conviction and that the trial court erred by not submitting jury charges on lesser offenses and by admitting hearsay in violation of Orona’s federal and state constitutional rights to cross-examination. We will affirm.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Scott Sartain was a methamphetamine user and an insulin-dependent…