Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Schmeling

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1994No. Civ. 930350PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

Wilbur Fisher appealed from a district court judgment dismissing his action against defendants Don Schmeling, Continental Real Estate (Continental), and Elmer and Louise Dukart (the Dukarts), arising out of a failed real estate transaction; Fisher sought to recover earnest money in the amount of $33,-000 which he had paid to the defendants, plus $10,000 in unspecified damages. The court also dismissed a counterclaim by the Du-karts, who sought recovery of actual damages allegedly sustained as a result of the failed transaction, in excess of the $33,000 award. We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coldwell Banker-First Realty v. MEIDE & SON, INCORPORATEDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Costello v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Heikkila v. CarverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Gordon v. PfabSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. Ray Farmers Union Elevator Co. v. WeyrauchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. O'BRIAN v. Langley SchoolSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  3. Circle B Enterprises, Inc. v. SteinkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kelly v. MarxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Hendricks Property Management Corp. v. Birchwood Properties Ltd. PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API