Legal Opinion

Fretwell v. Protection Alarm Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1988No. 66393PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMA WILSON, Justice:

As a result of a burglary in August, 1984, the Fretwells sued Protection Alarm Company, which installed and maintained a burglary alarm system in the Fretwells’ residence. In a negligence action the Fret-wells claimed that the alarm company had failed to notify the police department of a cut in their telephone service, which is the line that carried the alarm signal; that they failed to use the house key supplied by the Fretwells to check the residence; and that they failed to call the list provided by the Fretwells of persons to be notified in the event of an alarm.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. General Motors Corp. v. PiskorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Central Alarm of Tucson v. GanemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Morgan Co. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Wedner v. Fidelity Security Sytems, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. E.H. Ashley & Co., Inc. And Willow Associates v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Tufaro v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. HardageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Schmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Quinlan v. Koch Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API