Legal Opinion

Diehl v. Welsh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1964No. 40365PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

The parties occupy the same relative positions in this court as they did in the lower court and will be referred to by name or as plaintiffs and defendants.

Plaintiffs, Lawrence J. Diehl and’Lorene Diehl, husband and wife, filed suit in the lower court against Frances J. Welsh, John B. Mansell and Lila Mansell, husband and wife, as defendants to recover $1000 that was paid to Frances J. Welsh as a down payment on the purchase of real estate, and for foreclosure of a vendee’s lien and for attorney’s fees. The Mansells were subsequent pttrchasers of the real estate from Frances…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Federal Land Bank of Wichita, Kan. v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Hawley v. TolbotSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Toomey v. SpornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Central Commercial Oil Co. v. Indian Territory Ill. Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. King v. OakleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Mortgage Clearing Corp. v. Baughman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Massey v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  4. Reid v. AuxierCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Massey v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API