Legal Opinion

Athas v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 18, 1979No. 405-76PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge

This civilian pay case, before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, presents questions dealing with alleged procedural irregularities connected with adverse personnel actions affecting plaintiffs’ employment rights. Because we find, under the facts of the instant case, that the Government failed to apprise plaintiffs of their right to appeal the adverse actions in question in violation of applicable statutes and agency regulations, we hold that plaintiffs are entitled to be reinstated in their former positions and awarded appropriate back pay.

Plaintiffs, before the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Grover v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  4. Gratehouse v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Gentry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barnett v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Christoffersen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Clifton L. Goodrich v. U. S. Department of the Navy and Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Halas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. Sokoloff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API