Legal Opinion
Christoffersen v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 20, 1982No. 507-80CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*999Plaintiffs bring this action for reinstatement, back pay, allowances, benefits and other damages arising out of the alleged wrongful termination of employment as civilian (federal) technicians and involuntary retirement from the Washington State National Guard. Défen'dant has brought a motion for summary judgment which plaintiffs oppose. For the reasons stated, defendant’s motion is granted.
Plaintiffs were all longtime officérs in the National Guard (ng) who also held positions as civilian "technicians” in the Guard. Over the course of their military careers, plaintiffs Christoffersen, Main,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Charles E. Chaudoin v. Clarence E. Atkinson, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Charles A. Nesmith v. Clyde E. FultonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Tennessee v. DunlapSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Johny Walker v. Clifford L. Alexander, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Gnagy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Denis E. Dehne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Dehne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Charles v. Rice, Secretary USAFCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Faulkner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Wright v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.