Russell v. Wall Wire Products Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This is not a complicated case. If it seems so it is because we must undertake certain technical descriptions which are difficult to follow without careful examination of the devices themselves, and the patents relating thereto, which were made available to the Court, as well as the trial court.
In essence this is a case of alleged stealing, not the kind of stealing condemned in the criminal code, but the gentler kind that is called the appropriation and use of another’s secret. This is what happened :
The plaintiff (who died after commencement of suit, but who will be referred to herein, for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- International Industries, Inc. v. Warren Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
- New York Scaffolding Co. v. Liebel-Binney Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hayes-Albion Corp. v. KuberskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Follmer, Rudzewicz & Co. v. KoscoMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Kubik, Inc. v. HullMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Shatterproof Glass Corp. v. Guardian Glass CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.