Legal Opinion

Follmer, Rudzewicz & Co. v. Kosco

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1985No. Docket Nos. 68111, 68117. (Calendar Nos. 2, 3)PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

In these cases, consolidated on appeal, the plaintiffs, who were employers of the defendants, seek to enforce against the defendants the employee’s agreement to compensate his employer if, within a given period of time after termination of employment, the employee provided services for a client of his employer.

Defendant Kosco is an accountant. Defendant Roche is an insurance agent. Defendant Independent Agencies, Inc., is a Michigan corporation engaged in the insurance business. Both Kosco and Roche admit they provided services for clients of their former employers.

The contracts of employment…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
  3. Hubbard v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Foti v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  5. Faw, Casson & Co. v. CranstonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Certified Restoration Dry Cleaning Network, L.L.C. v. Tenke Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. BDO Seidman v. HirshbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Innovation Ventures v. Liquid ManufacturingMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. HaassTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hayes-Albion Corp. v. KuberskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API