Legal Opinion

Fidelity Federal Bank v. Larken Motel Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1991No. 91-0682PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DuBOIS, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Fidelity Federal Bank (“the Bank”), a California citizen, brought this action against defendants, Larken Motel Company (“Larken”), a Pennsylvania limited partnership, Kenneth S. Stein (“Stein”), a resident of Pennsylvania, and Larry Coleman (“Coleman”), a New Jersey resident, seeking payment on a promissory note and related documents. The asserted basis of jurisdiction is diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Defendants, prior to the commencement of this federal case, filed a Complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Financial Corp. v. CallisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Nigro v. BlumbergDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Samaroo v. SamarooDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. Oehme Carrier Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Reitz v. DieterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Security Title Guar. Corp. of BaltimoreDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API