London v. Marco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
Plaintiff has appealed from an order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction to restrain a foreclosure sale of property under a deed of trust.
Defendants Marco sold a single-family dwelling to plaintiffs. Pursuant to the terms of the escrow relating to the sale plaintiffs took possession of the property and some or all of them have occupied it continuously since September 15, 1949. As a part of the consideration the Marcos accepted a promissory note secured by a third deed of trust executed by plaintiff Theodore London for an amount in excess of $40,000, payable in installments. By…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Kendall v. FoulksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Piper v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Lutz v. Western Iron & Metal Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. People's Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. MaloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Flavio v. McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960