Legal Opinion

Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. People's Ditch Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1917No. S. F. No. 6933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County granting an injunction pendente lite. George E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

Appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction pendente lite in an action begun in Fresno County, enjoining defendants from appropriating from Kings River at any time water in the aggregate in excess of nine hundred cubic feet flowing per second. The order was made on notice to show cause and after argument. It was based upon a verified complaint in an action to quiet plaintiff’s title to the said waters, supported by affidavit. Certain counter-affidavits were offered by the defendants in opposition to the relief sought.

The complaint sets out the following facts: In the year 1897 the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Huffner v. SawdayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Family Record Plan, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Scott v. Fruit Growers Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. Mobile Magic Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. MaloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Flavio v. McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API