Legal Opinion
Boroos v. Roseau Agency, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 1984No. C8-83-1735PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
These consolidated actions were brought by Melvin Boroos and Allen and Joyce Bo-roos against Roseau Agency, Inc., State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (State Farm), Milbank Mutual Insurance Company (Milbank), and The Home Insurance Company (The Home) in April 1982. Plaintiffs each sought a declaration of their rights to underinsured motorists coverage and in their suits against State Farm and Milbank, seek a reformation of their individual policies.
The Home filed cross claims against co-defendants State Farm and Milbank, personal insurers of Melvin Boroos and Allen Boroos…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Hammer v. Malkerson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Doerner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Arbitration Between Hennen & St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Murphy v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Miller v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Howell v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Sawyer v. Midland Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Murphy v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.