Legal Opinion

Petit v. Petit

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action to annul marriage. Application by plaintiff for judgment on default.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

In March, 1902, the defendant brought action for divorce against his wife, Ida. They were both residents of this State. The said Ida counterclaimed alleging that he was then living in meretricious relations with Martha, the. present plaintiff. Judgment was rendered in favor of the wife and the decision of the court filed October 18, 1902, on which day an interlocutory judgment was entered. On the twenty-fifth — seven days later — the plaintiff and defendant went to the State of Vermont and there intermarried, returning immediately to this State where they resided together as husband and wife…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Kerrison v. KerrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Gibson v. GibsonNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  4. United States Life Ins. v. JordanNew York Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pettit v. PettitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People v. KayCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
  4. Adams v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Adams v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API