Legal Opinion
People v. Kay
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided August 5, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brodsky,
City Magistrate. The complainant, Mary Kay, charges the defendant, Constantine Kay, with being a disorderly person by reason of his abandonment of and his failure adequately to support her. The defendant denies that he is a disorderly person by virtue of his failure to support complainant because he alleges that he is not her husband. The complaint is brought under section 899, subdivision 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which reads as follows: “ The following are disorderly persons: 1. Persons who actually abandon their wives or children, without adequate support, or leave them…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Fischer v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Moore v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- McCullen v. McCullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Pettit v. PettitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomas Spinozzi and Linda Spinozzi v. Itt Sheraton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Lewis v. New York State DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Oswald v. OswaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- McCarter v. McCarterNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. EzeonuNew York Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.