Adams v. Adams
New York Supreme Court
Action by Maud W. Adams against Frederick T. Adams for divorce. After interlocutory judgment for plaintiff, defendant applies for the entry of final judgment. Plaintiff resists the application, and asks to discontinue the action. Defendant’s application denied. Application to discontinue continued.
1Opinion of the CourtBetts, J.
On or about December 20, 1905, the plaintiff commenced an action for an absolute divorce against the defendant upon statutory grounds. The defendant appeared and answered. Such proceedings were subsequently had therein that a referee was appointed, who reported in favor of the plaintiff, and on February 3, 1906, the usual interlocutory judgment of divorce in favor of the plaintiff was entered in this case; final judgment to be entered in three months, as provided by section 1774 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff having after the expiration of said 3 months failed to move for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Pettit v. PettitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Chase v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Petit v. PetitNew York Supreme Court · 1904
- Pettit v. PettitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coon v. CoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Willoughby v. WilloughbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Dudgeon v. DudgeonNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Brodsky v. BrodskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925