People v. Ortiz
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Defendant appeals from a conviction of second degree murder. The sole issue arises from the denial of defendant’s motion to discharge counsel: we are asked to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeal regarding the duty of a trial court when a defendant who has retained counsel, but becomes indigent, makes a timely motion to discharge his attorney and to obtain court-appointed counsel.
Here, the Court of Appeal held the trial court erred in denying such a motion on the ground that defendant failed to demonstrate his attorneys were incompetent. We conclude the Court of Appeal is…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Charles Bland, Jr. v. California Department of Corrections Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- People v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. Hajek and VoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.