Legal Opinion

People v. Ortiz

California Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1990No. S010853PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction of second degree murder. The sole issue arises from the denial of defendant’s motion to discharge counsel: we are asked to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeal regarding the duty of a trial court when a defendant who has retained counsel, but becomes indigent, makes a timely motion to discharge his attorney and to obtain court-appointed counsel.

Here, the Court of Appeal held the trial court erred in denying such a motion on the ground that defendant failed to demonstrate his attorneys were incompetent. We conclude the Court of Appeal is…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Charles Bland, Jr. v. California Department of Corrections Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. People v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. Hajek and VoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API